Ethics in the Legal System: A Fair Trial in Registered Quasi-Judicial Bodies

 Background: A fair and just trial, as one of the most fundamental moral demands in the legal system, can have positive consequences in the legal system. The effectiveness of the registration system in society is increasing and it is necessary to conduct appropriate surveys to meet their expectations, especially in terms of paying attention to the substantive rules of fair trial. The rules and regulations of registration do not explicitly mention a fair trial, and a dual system is conceivable. First, in some of these principles, statements are made in order to comply with it in registered quasi-judicial bodies. Second, the existence of shortcomings that lead the scales in that direction, and in general, that sufficient and worthy attention is not paid to the position and importance of the principles of fair trial in the process of forming quasi-judicial bodies. This article, while examining the quasi-judicial bodies, shows that a fair trial is one of the branches of ethical and desirable proceedings, which, despite its high importance in registration laws and regulations, has received less attention. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that it is not possible to fully extend the guarantees of a fair and just trial in these panels and in all stages of the proceedings, which leads to the violation of the rights of individuals. It is worthwhile to consider a favorable process in reviewing the registration rules and regulations, reflecting the rules of fair trial and determining the executive guarantee, in order to increase the possibility of fair trial of the above bodies and not to shake the moral foundations of the legal system.